They don’t see it as Rape-Awareness of Gang Rape speech

Hello Girls

Gang Rape! There are other names to coin this term like pack rape or group rape but ultimately it is the same thing. Many of you may or may not have experienced this crime but you should all know that this takes place. We all have heard of the scenarios where girls meet with boys which lead to the girl getting banged out without their consent. You do not want that happening to you!

Commentary

The use of the short sentence and proper nouns will make the listeners know exactly what the speech is going to entail and the powerful importance of the topic. The tone of the speech is relaxed to appeal to the audience who are teenage females. The use of the words ‘pack rape and group rape’ makes direct connection with the text. The slang words’ banged out’ also creates rapport with the listeners as they are young and correlates with the author as she uses slang in the text. The pronoun, you, is impactful and conversational as it gets the audience thinking about themselves.

Holly and Jessica: 'True crime'

Holly and Jessica- ‘True Crime’

True Crime takes you into the story of a brutal crime by Ian Huntley, the caretaker who killed two ten year old girls. A crime that involves a crude, brutal and gruesome murder of two total innocent young girls by a man with a history of hostility towards women. Holly and Jessica went out to the high street for sweets in their Manchester shirts one Sunday evening after a family barbeque and were never seen alive by anyone else except Ian Huntley. He lured the girls back to his home by telling them that their school teacher, Maxine Carr, was there waiting for them. Knowing that their favourite teacher was there, the girls were trapped by Huntley’s lie and followed him to their deaths. All evidence found lead to Ian Huntley but denial and rejection was all he contributed to the case at first. His selfishness and demeanour of self pity was all that he presented until he knew that the court would not find him innocent of the charges he faced. The courage of Huntley to try and surpass this true crime of monstrosity is incredible. What persuaded this man to cajole these girls and murder them is a question that is not still answered but needs to be as this crime is truly bizarre. Huntley showed a strange emotion when he vomited outside the bathroom shortly after taking the girls lives. Dragging the bagged girls in his vomit, throughout the house and into the back of his jeep imitates a sort of disposal of unwanted ‘items’ in ones homes. Huntley disposed of the bodies near a river bank on the stems of trees where he naively thought that they would not be found. Knowing his actions and state crime, Huntley went along on the missing trail find for the girls and probably found this scenario a true crime!

Commentary

Taking into consideration that one of the purposes of this piece was to entertain, emotional language such as the adjective innocent and verb naively was incorporated so that it can match the audience and purpose. The exclamation at the end of the article was used as a bit of humour to show that even the murderer would be fascinated in the scenario of his own actions. The use of the syndetic list, ‘crude, brutal and gruesome’ drags out the type of death that the girls faced which creates empathy towards them.

On the Murder of James Bulger- TV voiceover

On the Murder of James Bulger- TV voiceover

Venables and Thompson: Monsters or Children?

James Bugler. The two year old who was abducted, tortured and murdered by Jon Venable and Robert Thompson. The little boy who simply went shopping with his mother on a normal afternoon but was never seen alive again. This documentary will take you into minds, courtroom procedures and interrogations with the two ten year old boys, who committed this senseless act and will impose the question, are they Monsters or Children?

The case has brought about national grief and fear for James Bulger and for so many citizens children. Venables and Thompson are now the youngest killers in the modern history of Britain but the reasoning behind their actions is still unknown to all of us. How can we view them? Murders, kidnappers, cold-hearted or confused, ignorant, innocent? Can we get out of our minds that these slaughterers and sex offenders were only 10 years old? Could we forgive their disregard to the act they committed because their minds are not fully developed? These questions were thought of by the legal team for this case and were taunted the minds of the public viewing this unheard of story.

To take any life is uncalled for by any person, but to know that the life of an innocent two year old boy was easily taken is never thought about. Venables and Thompson did not confess their roles in this crime until they were interrogated every day. They cried wildly and spoke of ‘playing in the subways’ with each other and without James Bulger. However, The legal team soon find out that this was false and that Bulger was with them all the way until they stopped and began their monstrous deed. Venable spoke of bricks, metal bars, kicks and undressing of the two year old who surely did not have a clue about the situation he was in. I did kill him was the outcry of Venable. Monster or Child?

Commentary

The use of the 3 powerful verbs at the beginning emphasizes the actions towards the killers to state the ‘monsters’ area of the task. The rhetorical questions in the middle paragraph is there to question the listeners on the impression they get from the killers to answer the title. The repetition of the slogan, monsters or children, was used to make known the purpose of the documentary so that the listeners could decide. The reference to a quotation from the article is used to state that this piece is factual and not fiction so that the listener knows it is reliable. The use of the victims name is proper pronoun form is there to make known as well as create empathy for him. The last rhetorical question is used to leave a lasting impression on the listener.

Justice at Night-Joe’s Diary

Justice at Night-Joe’s Diary

“Some goddam nigger, name of Hyancith”...

Those words have played on my mind from last night. How uncompassionate of those men to refer to Hyancith in such a manner. Southerners!

I still cannot gather why such a crime is allowed and tolerated in a world where social integration should be embraced.  When times are rapidly moving along and individuals should be noticed.

What a ‘gathering’, the murder of an innocent was a gathering for these Southerners. At night they mingle and marvel at the sight of an innocent being hanged for an act that was ridiculously believed. An old woman in her forty’s or fifty’s is no one  to get excited about and being a young man Hyancith could have never tried a thing with her. Anyone could have seen that...

The fear and pity Hyancith showed, never again do I want to experience such sympathy. Brutality at the first degree- Dragged and hanged....

I feel like I participated by witnessing such an act of barbarism and certain crude. If only I could have helped, stopped, changed the whole situation and sighting. Looking at that poor boy...

The causality of murdering a ‘negro’ in the middle of nowhere, under a massive tree should be alarming to each and every one of those spectators. But noooooo! They stand and chant and extremely ridicule this young man.

The image still flames in my head. The burning of human flesh, the tugging, dragging, hatred towards this boy is definitely a scene that will imprint my mind....

If only I could change what happened, helped him, even not look.

If only

Commentary

I began with a quotation from the book to emphasis the ‘trauma’ that Joe experiences from watching the scene. I repeated a lot of ellipses to show that Joe could not construct his words and really felt what happened. Also, I used adjectives to describe the exact feelings of Joe and the night before. I repeated the noun Southerners to re-enforce that it was a new surrounding for Joe and that he disliked where he was. I put a few spaces to show that the subject was a difficult one for Joe to write in his diary.

Interview on Double Life

Section of Interview with Christina Lamb

Interviewer: We are still here with Christina Lamb talking about her experiences in her career being a war journalist and the struggle that she faces with having a family at home. So Christina, What made you want to be a war journalist?

Christina: I wanted to represent the women that are not in the profession of war journalism. I wanted to show that women can lead the way in retrieving extreme stories and exclusives from the heart of the problem. The war is something that people from the outside world tend to shy away from but I felt that being a war journalist will aid in giving the English the true and in depth coverage of what is going on.

Interviewer: That is a great achievement Ms.Lamb to be a positive role model for women to aspire to. What feeling do you get or what rushes through your mind when you are in the middle of a war or horrifying point in your travels?

Christina: I consider myself an adrenaline junkie so when I am in the middle of war I get excited but still scared but I also think about the next time I will be in the same situation. I get a sort of exhilarating feeling which I want to continue feeling.


Interviewer: Do you feel that you are neglecting son, family life?


Christina:  Not at all. I am blessed to have a husband that I do. He takes care of our son like if he is both of us put together. I am grateful for what he does and he reassures me that our son has a healthy life.

Interviewer: Do you not feel that your career is damaging to your being?

Christina: Again, not at all.  I cannot contain the passion that I have for this career. This is all I wanted to do and want to do till the feelings that I get when I am in Afghanistan and other such places fades away. However, I do doubt this.

Interviewer: Would you choose between family life and war journalist?

Christina:  No. I struggle with this question all the time but I believe that I juggle the both greatly.

The Feminine Mystique-H/W

Classroom Activities

• How is sex used in horror films?

Sex is used in horror films to give an idea on who will be killed or haunted by the antagonist. For example, in Scary movie 1, a character who sleeps around gets killed first out of a group of others.

• Is it true that virginal female characters are more likely to survive in a slasher flick?

Virgins are viewed as the most innocent in a horror film so they wont be the one targeted by the antagonist, however, this may also be a reason why virgins are killed because they will be seen as too pure to be alive. For example, in Jennifer's Body, Jennifer is possessed by a spirit because she was a virgin.

• Some writers have identified many horror film tropes as relating to men's fear of women. Can you think of any film standards that make the feminine monstrous?

Film standards that make the feminine monstrous is instances where the woman is possessed as a demon or other mystical creatures, has a link with others in the spirit world.

Focus on the paragraphy starting at the bottom of p.193 'The horror subtext is the lawyer's developing dread...'

• What is effective about the language in this extract?

The language used draws attention to the views that men have of females damaging what they have made and are proud of. The lexical sets used on females and feminists illustrates that that is the main focus of the paragraph.

• How does Kael use lexis and semantics to create an impression of the aspects of the film?

Kael uses lexis and semantics to create an impression of the aspects of the film by relating them to the views that men have of women. For example, she uses the lexis of attributes of women like emotions and crazy to emphasis that that is how men see women.

• How does Kael use rhetorical features to support her argument?

Kael uses rhetorical features to support her argument to get the reader thinking about their thoughts on the opposite sex through her description of them.

• How is syntax effective in this extract?

Syntax is effect in this extract because it is written how people would speak it and not how good it will look professionally. For example, 'she's merely a monster in a monster flick'. The adjective, monster, did not have to be placed there before she described the movie. If people were explaning it to a friend, they may have said it the way she did.

Beginning of ‘essay’ on The Feminine Mystique

                In films, women and men are sometimes shown in different lights than the stereotypical images we as citizens have of each other. It is becoming common in films like Jennifer’s Body and Fatal Attraction, that female sexuality is a criterion that must be filled when producing movies. This extreme female sexuality has been exaggerated and has become a cliché in most cases.

                Immense female sexuality has been seen in the form of the ‘girl next door’, ‘horny housewife’, ‘outside woman’ or just a lonely sad woman. These roles show women to be overly interested and frustrated about sex which gives negative labels to women in society. It is unbearable to know that these representations of females are made and presented to the public. Normal women take offence to be seen as those types of people.

                From the point of view of a man, women are merely seen as sexual objects from the way that they are portrayed in films where they exert intense sexuality. This can be transferred into society because men may think that all women have this quality and will treat them in accordance to how they are seen in films.

                Female sexuality is now more about extravert and open sexual frustration than the subtleness of what it once was in films. Instead of their being a woman that is confident about herself and position in life, they are now shown as desperate women in need for sex. This is seen in Fatal Attraction where the antagonist is a woman that sets eyes on a man and doesn’t want to let him go because of her need for him. This shows women in society to be needy and dependent on the presence of a man in their life.

Radio Play on ‘Why I want a Wife’

Characters

Charlie

Louise

EVENING.LOUISE AND CHARLIE ARE AT LOUISE’S APARTENT WATCHING A ROMANTIC MOVIE.

SX: BACKGROUND SOUND OF MOVIE

Louise: That was sooo sweet. (Sniffles)

Charlie: Yes that was really nice of him to propose at the super bowl games.

Louise: Ow, I hope I could get such a proposal one day from someone special (she winks at him)

Charlie: Is there anything else you request?

Louise: I want a husband who will love me unconditionally despite my flaws. A husband that will romance me when I feel down and depressed. I would even like my husband to buy me ice cream and flowers every weekend. This may sound trivial to you Charlie but (Pause) I would like a husband who will stare at me in the morning when I wake up. I want a husband who will take care of our children if I can’t for any reason. A husband that will spend as much time with them as me. I want a husband who will ensure that they go to the dentist, the doctors, the opticians when their annual appointment comes around.

Charlie: It seems like you know exactly what you want in a husband.

Louise: SX (gasp as she tries to say something)

Charlie: I am sure you’re not done yet?

Louise nods

Louise: I want a husband who will pedicure my toes for me. To wash and dry my hair when I feel lazy. A husband that will be in extreme love with my parents. One who will visit them without me and my knowledge. A husband who will get them gifts. I want a husband who will not cheat on me. I would not have to feel insecure if I go to the restroom at a club and leave him on his own. One who will tell me I am beautiful

CHARLIE INTERRUPTS

Charlie: You are beautiful Louise.

Louise blushes

Charlie: Can I (Pause) be the husband you are describing?

Louise holds her hands to her mouth and widens her eyes

Charlie gets down on his knees, reaches for a ring in his back pocket and says,

WILL YOU MARRY ME LOUISE?

SX: ‘Here comes the Bride’-Wedding music

THE END

Commentary

I used a lot of short sentences in the play to sure Louise’s need to complete what she wants in a marriage. I made it like Charlie was paying attention to her needs by giving him minimal lines. I used the right sound effects to give the reader a musical sense of certain situations in the play. I repeated,’ I want a husband’ so it was clear to the listeners that this is her interpretation of a husband and no one else’s. A wrote a little gestures so that it conveys that they are acting this out in the listener’s mind whilst they watch.

Language is used in a radio play to create drama because the listeners cannot visually see what is taking place in the play. Thus, the need for correct imagery and sound effects for them to get the writers message.